The transition of TP’s on the deck of a vessel always causes controversy. Which steel structural option to implement! There are two main focus’s, either Option 1 . A tailor made design. High initial investment, long term cost reductions, no vessel flexibility, repeat use for many multiple projects with the same cargo and vessel Option
By MBM-Marketing
MBM was given a task to define a method to stow trains without additional D-rings or welding. The freight forwarder had the aim to maintain the operation without welding as it would be an issue at port of discharge and also to maintain costs of the project, and to assist in returning the vessel to
By MBM-Marketing
4x560ton Monopiles were successfully loaded on a vessel with 1 hold, LBP=96m, Deadweight =4630t. The vessel hatchcovers were folding type with strength 1.71t/m^2. The transport frame for the cargo was made from HEB 280’s and simply positioned to distribute the roll motion forces to the main transversals of the hatchcover. The added structure was designed
By MBM-Marketing
By MBM-Marketing
By MBM-Marketing
By MBM-Marketing
An exciting project and contract was agreed between MBM and ‘Ian Taylor & Company’ to undertake the design for the transportation cradles to load a 460ton tug to be transported from China to Chile. The project is set to complete early February 2010. (see project update)
2006-2020 MBM Consultancy Germany. Powered By Impressive Business WordPress Theme